Housing Monthly Diary Archive

Homelessness


Return To The HMD Archive Index

January 1998
Ombudsman: Delays in Housing Homeless Family

A family arrived in Britain as refugees in 1991. They presented themselves to Westminster City Council as homeless in 1994.

In their complaint to the Ombudsman, they alleged that Westminster City Council provided unsuitable temporary accommodation and delayed in securing permanent accommodation for them.

Their complaint also alleged that Waltham Forest LBC delayed in accepting its duty under Part III of the Housing Act 1985 to secure accommodation for them.

Findings:

The Ombudsman did not support an allegation that the temporary accommodation was unsuitable, but commented that "while it may be suitable and tolerable for a short time, it was not reasonable to expect a family of four, including two young children, to live in it for over two years".

Investigation No. 96/A/1907 (Westminster CC) and No. 96/A/3607 (Waltham Forest LBC).

February 1998
Rough Sleepers' Initiative Update

Housing Minister Hilary Armstrong announced a further £1.5 million funding for Rough Sleepers' Initiative (RSI) throughout England. This additional pump-priming funding for the next 12 months came on top of the £20 million already announced for strategies in 18 areas outside central London. It would support local rough sleepers' strategies in 16 new areas and fund additional hostel staff in 5 existing areas.

Local authorities in 26 areas, in liaison with other statutory agencies and the voluntary sector, submitted requests in December 1997 for funding of rough sleeping strategies. This latest round of funding was to support outreach and resettlement work in 16 of those 26 areas, with the aim of helping rough sleepers to move from life on the streets into settled accommodation.

The areas covered by the funding were Brent, Bury, Camden, Croydon, Gloucester, Great Yarmouth, Guildford, Islington, Northampton, Norwich, Plymouth, Portsmouth, Reading, Sheffield, Slough and Stoke-on-Trent.

The Government also considered new bids for funding hostel staff from voluntary organisations in some areas already funded. As a result, hostels in Bournemouth, Exeter, Ealing, Richmond and Oxford were to have additional assistance.

February 1998
Homelessness News in Brief

March 1998
Funding for Voluntary Organisations

Housing Minister Hilary Armstrong announced details of 205 projects nationwide to get financial assistance to help combat homelessness, mainly amongst young people.

Projects winning financial support included those which promoted business involvement in supporting homelessness organisations and regional projects aimed at developing local strategies. The projects would provide advice and direct practical support to people who were homeless or faced with losing their homes. All the projects had the support of their local authority and had been set up specifically to meet local needs.

The successful bids included accommodation registers and resettlement projects, emergency accommodation and rent/deposit guarantee schemes. The largest project funded was the National Homelessness Advice Service provided by Shelter and the National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux.

All of the bids were funded under Section 180 of the Housing Act 1996, which provides for the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions to make grants to voluntary sector organisations concerned with homelessness. The programme complemented funding provided through the Rough Sleepers' Initiative.

Further information: Tel. 0171 890 3333.

March 1998
Lottery Grants Announced

Awards made by the National Lottery Charities Board included more than £1 million to Shelter, which would fund new Homeless to Homes Programmes in Birmingham, Bristol and Sheffield - aimed at helping previously homeless families to settle into permanent accommodation.

Other awards for homelessness projects included:

March 1998
Homelessness News in Brief

March 1998
Ombudsman: Accommodation Unsuitable for Wheelchair

The Ombudsman issued a report recommending that Barnet LBC should pay compensation of £1,500 for failures in the way that it dealt with a couple's rehousing needs.

His report found that the Council failed to take account of the individual needs of a disabled woman when it allocated her and her husband accommodation, following their eviction and being made homeless. The Council initially nominated the couple to a housing association home, which did not provide adequate mobility for the woman.

The Council was made aware of the woman's need to sometimes use a wheelchair but there were further delays in suitably rehousing them.

Investigation No. 95/A/2575 (Barnet LBC).

March 1998
Ombudsman: Council Caused Avoidable Distress

The Ombudsman found that Westminster CC failed to deal properly with the housing application of a homeless man, with a history of mental health problems, and his partner.

The Council accepted a duty to rehouse the couple but nominated them to accommodation that was unsuitable. When they refused this accommodation, the Council decided that it had discharged its duty to them.

In October 1996, the Council admitted that it had been at fault and apologised. The Council had no suitable accommodation available until December 1996, so its failure had not caused the couple to be deprived of suitable accommodation. However, the Ombudsman considered that the couple had been caused much avoidable distress and trouble and, in the circumstances, the man was particularly vulnerable because of his medical condition. He recommended that the Council should pay £1,000 compensation.

Investigation No. 97/A/011 (Westminster CC).

April 1998
RSI Update

April 1998
Homelessness News in Brief

Challenge and Opportunity: Faith in Leeds, 53 Cardigan Lane, Leeds, LS4 2LE: £1.

May 1998
News in Brief

In addition to Waltham Forest LBC, councils taking part were Brent LBC, Croydon LBC, Hackney LBC, Hillingdon LBC, Hounslow LBC, Islington LBC, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, the Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames, Lambeth LBC, Newham LBC, Tower Hamlets LBC and Canterbury DC.

June 1998
Homeless News in Brief

July 1998
Reforms to End Rough Sleeping

The Social Exclusion Unit released its second report aimed at tackling what was described by Prime Minister Tony Blair as symbols of a divided society. The report highlighted the Government's objectives of cutting rough sleeping by two-thirds by the year 2002, with a radical package of measures:

The report attracted some criticism. Whilst £145 million is available between 1999 and 2002 to dramatically cut rough sleeping in the Capital, only £32 million is available during the same period for tackling rough sleeping in the English regions outside of London. This equates to less than £11 million per year, which in real terms is a cut on the £17 million received by homeless organisations outside London last year.

July 1998
Reforms in Support for Asylum Seekers

The Government issued a White Paper, which introduced radical changes in the way that help was to be offered to asylum seekers. It also aimed to relieve the few councils, mainly in London, who carried the intolerable burden of dealing with housing and support of those seeking asylum in the country.

The main change would be an amendment to the National Assistance Act 1948, under which local authorities were charged with providing care and accommodation for destitute asylum seekers. Instead, a new Home Office agency would be set up and charged with contracting accommodation from landlords in the social housing sector in all areas of the country. The proposals illustrated the Government's fundamental change in thinking, with the intention of giving support in kind to asylum seekers, rather than cash payments. Under the proposals, asylum seekers would be offered accommodation on a no choice basis.

July 1998
Homelessness News in Brief

August 1998
RSI Update

August 1998
News in Brief

August 1998
Ombudsman: Transfer Delay Leaves Man Living in Fear

The complainant applied for a transfer because he was experiencing violent harassment and had suffered serious injuries. He expressed a wish to move anywhere away from his current area. He was separated from his wife, but had access to his daughter and he required a room for her. He complained that:

The Ombudsman concluded that:

The Ombudsman’s report recommended that the Council:

Investigation No. 96/C/3071 (Chester CC).

September 1998
News in Brief

October 1998
Homelessness in Brief - Wales

October 1998
Ombudsman: Series of Flawed Procedures

The Ombudsman highlighted a number of issues in his report on a complaint against Harborough DC.

Firstly, the complainant presented himself as homeless in June 1996 and was immediately housed in a Council hostel while investigations were carried out. Those investigations ended by early August that year, but no decision was given to the man on whether the Council had a duty to house him, which the Ombudsman concluded was a breach of the Council's statutory duty and was maladministration.

The Council served a Notice requiring the man to quit the hostel within 7 days for having friends staying in his room. He should have been given a written warning of this first and been given an opportunity to refute the evidence against him and/or alter his behaviour. Failure to follow these procedures was also maladministration.

The decision to evict him was made in the absence of a decision as to whether the Council retained any duty to house him, and it was flawed by maladministration. On receiving the Notice, the man returned to his parents and no assessment was made by the Council on whether that discharged it of responsibility to him, which was also maladministration.

The Ombudsman's report concluded that, as a consequence of the Council's maladministration, the man lived in unsuitable housing for perhaps 18 months longer than he needed to have done. The Council should pay him £1,750 in compensation and offer him suitable accommodation as soon as possible.

Investigation No. 97/B/4670 (Harborough DC).

November 1998
Rough Sleepers Update

The Winter Shelter Programme was part of the Government's overall drive to reduce the number of people sleeping rough on the streets by two-thirds by 2002. As part of the ongoing efforts to tackle and prevent rough sleeping throughout the year across England, the Government is:
providing £34 million to voluntary organisations outside London over three years from April 1999 under the new Homelessness Action Programme, with the aim of taking forward progress already made under the Rough Sleepers' Initiative;
setting up a special unit, attached to the DETR, to tackle London's rough sleeping. The unit under a newly-recruited head is, from April, co-ordinating government action in managing an integrated budget of £145 million over three years.

The Winter Shelter Programme ran from late November to the end of March 1999, offering free accommodation, food and a range of other supports and resettlement services to people who would otherwise sleep rough. This year the Programme funded voluntary organisations, subject to planning permission, to provide more than 470 beds in London and over 70 beds in Bristol, Cambridge and Brighton. A further 88 emergency beds were available in London, Bristol and Brighton if the weather became particularly severe.

These temporary winter shelters were funded by DETR, as part of the £73 million Rough Sleepers' Initiative and were run by voluntary sector agencies and housing associations. This year, two empty buildings from the Government's estate were identified as suitable for use:

St George's Court, managed by the Defence Estates Agency.
2 Marsham Street, a former DETR building.
The Department of Health's funding of £200,000 was to support specialist services for people with mental health problems in the winter shelters.

November 1998
Homeless Helpline Launched in Wales

Shelter Cymru launched Shelterline, a free housing telephone advice service to provide round-the-clock help for those facing homelessness in Wales. The service provides advice on accessing emergency accommodation, guidance, counselling and mediation. As well as dealing with problems before they become too serious, Shelterline seeks to help those who need intensive assistance and support to lead a stable life.

In welcoming the launch of Shelterline, Welsh Housing Minister Jon Owen Jones said that, if there is a need to adjust other programmes to provide more money for helping rough sleepers, then the Government will do so. The Welsh Office invited local authorities and the voluntary sector to apply for additional money for projects run by voluntary organisations to assist people sleeping rough over the winter months.

December 1998
Homelessness News in Brief

December 1998
Ombudsman: Homelessness Applicant’s Possessions Lost

The Ombudsman issued a report on a complaint from an applicant that Southwark LBC had destroyed his (and his partner’s and child’s) possessions, which he valued at £5,000.

The Council had stored the possessions whilst considering the complainant’s application for housing as a person threatened with homelessness. The Council then lost contact with the complainant and decided that it had no homelessness duty to him (or his partner). The Council tried to contact the complainant and request he collects his possessions. Unfortunately, the Council lost the relevant file at the material time and it was unable to locate the address of either the complainant’s parents, or that of the partner’s parents. The Council subsequently destroyed the possessions.

The Ombudsman’s report concluded that the loss of the file at the material time was maladministration. As a result, the complainant lost the opportunity to reclaim his possessions. However, the report also noted that the complainant did not take adequate steps to keep the Council informed of his current address. Nonetheless, the Ombudsman’s report concluded that the maladministration did cause injustice and recommends that the Council pay the complainant £500 compensation.

Investigation No. 98/A/0758 (Southwark LBC).

January 1999
News in Brief

February 1999
Funding for Homelessness Projects

Housing Minister, Hilary Armstrong, announced 254 national and local schemes run by voluntary organisations to tackle and prevent homelessness. The programme is part of the Government's efforts to tackle homelessness, by working in partnership with the voluntary sector, local authorities and others. The aim is to reduce the number of people sleeping rough on the streets by two-thirds by 2002, as well as to deal with the causes of homelessness to keep people off the streets in the first place.

The projects included in the current announcement are being funded by the Government's Homelessness Action Programme (HAP), which will provide £34 million over the next three years to tackle homelessness. The latest grants announced total £27 million, funding 156 new and 98 continuing projects. A further announcement was expected shortly, on the allocation of the remaining £7 million.

The HAP is to target help at existing rough sleepers and preventative work with single homeless people. The projects announced will be funded for up to three years, depending on good results. Further funding will be available from the Department of Health's Homeless Mentally Ill Initiative and the Drugs and Alcohol Specific Grant programme.

The projects are spread throughout England but none of them are in London, where initiatives to tackle rough sleeping will be co-ordinated by a new Unit being set up from April 1999 (see below).

Note: The HAP initiative brings together two previous programmes - the Rough Sleepers' Initiative and funding under Section 180 of the Housing Act - both of which came to an end in March 1999.

February 1999
Head of London's Rough Sleepers' Unit

Housing campaigner Louse Casey was appointed to head the new London Rough Sleepers' Unit, which has been set up to take a strategic approach to reducing the number of people sleeping on the streets in London, by linking the work of Central Government departments and agencies, local authorities, the voluntary sector and business.

Louise Casey was formerly the Deputy Director of Shelter, a post that she had held since 1992. Within Shelter she played a lead role on social exclusion issues - particularly concerning rough sleeping. Before joining Shelter, she was the Director of Homeless Network, co-ordinating services to rough sleepers in central London. She has also worked for St Mungo Association, managing the provision of direct services to single homeless men.

It is estimated that about 400 people sleep rough in London on any given night and around 2,400 people will sleep rough at some point during the year. The new Unit will have an integrated budget of £145 million over three years and it is operational from 1st April 1999.

The Unit is attached to the DETR and it covers all of the 32 London boroughs. It is directly responsible to the Ministerial Committee on Rough Sleeping, which is chaired by Housing Minister Hilary Armstrong.

Louise Casey was due to take up her new post in May.

February 1999
Revised Policy for Scottish Homes

New measures aimed at promoting a better understanding of the causes of homelessness, including research into the effect of hospital closure programmes, are outlined in a new report published by national housing agency, Scottish Homes.

Launching the Agency's new homelessness policy, its Chief Executive, Peter McKinlay, said that tackling homelessness was a key priority for the Government and it was likely to be high on the agenda of the new Scottish Parliament. The causes can, however, often be complex and action to prevent homelessness occurring is, therefore, of fundamental importance.

The Agency was to commission a study to establish if people who have been discharged from long-stay hospitals and institutions back into the community are being given the necessary housing and support services to enable them to live as independently as possible. The Agency has also undertaken joint research with Shelter to examine the reasons and the trends behind the apparent increase in the numbers of rural homeless, so that local authorities can incorporate the findings in any local strategies.

The Agency's new policy statement also highlights key areas for future action, which include:

February 1999
New Homeless Hostel in Dundee

Work started on a £1.1 million project to build a hostel for homeless people in Dundee. The development - off the City's Foundry Lane - will provide emergency accommodation for 14 people to stay overnight. A further ten small flats, offering longer-term homes, will also be provided.

The project is being carried out by Gowrie HA, with more than £770,000 in grant aid from Scottish Homes and £96,500 from Dundee CC. As well as the public subsidy, the project is attracting nearly £300,000 in private finance.

The new hostel will be run by the Dundee Survival Group and it will replace an existing Emergency Night Shelter at Lochee Road. The Group is expected to move into the new hostel in Spring 2000.

Scottish Homes, along with the Council and Tayside Health Board, have also pledged to provide further grants to help meet the ongoing running costs of the new hostel.

February 1999
Homelessness News in Brief

February 1999
Ombudsman: Priority on Waiting List Lost Due to Errors

The complainant, his wife and five children, live in a five-bedroomed house with his mother, and his brother and sister-in-law and their three children. Thirteen people have to share one toilet and one bathroom. The house is owned by the complainant's brother.

In his report, the Ombudsman decides that, on balance, the complainant first applied to the Council for rehousing in September 1990. He also finds that the Council did not register the complainant on the waiting list until about a year later.

In April 1992, the complainant told the Council that his brother had asked him and his family to move out of the house. The Ombudsman's report concludes that there was excessive delay in making enquiries about the complainant's homelessness and, that as a result, his application was suspended from consideration for too long.

The Council had made the complainant no offers of rehousing by June 1997. This, the Ombudsman concludes was not as a consequence of maladministration but, rather, because of the shortage of housing suitable for the family and the higher priority of other applicants.

The Council deleted the complainant from its homelessness list in June 1997, claiming that this was because he had not replied to a standard letter sent to all applicants threatened with homelessness. However, the complainant denies ever receiving such a letter and the Council has no copy of such a letter to the complainant, nor can it produce a copy of the standard letter.

The Ombudsman finds that:

He finds that this caused the complainant injustice because he lost the priority for rehousing, which he had been accruing as a homeless applicant since May 1992.

The Ombudsman recommends that the Council should:

Investigation No. 97/A/3659 (Lambeth LBC)

March 1999
Assistance for Welsh Rough Sleepers

The Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Michael, announced an additional £250,000 to boost work to help people who are sleeping rough in Wales during the coming year. He also announced grants of almost £78,000 this year to help voluntary organisations working with homeless people over the winter period. The £78,000 goes to voluntary organisations across Wales, who submitted bids to the Welsh Office for grant money, with the backing of local authorities.

The main criteria for approval were that the projects should demonstrate a commitment to eliminating the need for rough sleeping, form part of strategy for tackling the whole problem, involve other agencies and make the most cost-effective use of resources.

The grants include £26,334 to Cardiff to provide direct services to the street homeless, £15,615 to determine the level and type of unmet need of rough sleepers in Bridgend and £4,500 for Denbighshire to allow a shelter in Rhyl to remain open for longer hours during the winter.

March 1999
Homelessness News In Brief

March 1999
Ombudsman: Failures in Dealing with Homelessness

The complainant was given wrong advice by Kirklees Metropolitan Council that she could not be rehoused because of rent arrears, as such a policy was not then in force. There was unreasonable delay in deciding on the complainant's eligibility for rehousing as a homeless person and informing her of that decision.

The Council further delayed in passing a request for transfer to another council and made inadequate arrangements for a private interview with the complainant. The result was that the complainant's request for rehousing was delayed by several weeks.

The Council has paid the complainant's removal and storage costs and a further £500 to compensate her for her distress and her time and trouble caused by its delay. The Council has also taken steps to improve its procedures in the future.

Ombudsman Patricia Thomas considers that the Council's actions provide a satisfactory local settlement of the complaint.

Investigation No. 97/C/4829 (Kirklees MC).

March 1999
Ombudsman: Tenancy Wrongly Repossessed

The Council repossessed the complainant's flat on the ground of surrendered tenancy, while she was away nursing her mother in another city. Her furniture and other items were taken into storage but some items were found missing on her return.

Ombudsman Jerry White's report concludes that it was not reasonable for the Council to assume that the tenancy had been surrendered and not to serve a Notice of Seeking Possession before repossessing the flat.

The report recommends that the Council pays the complainant £1,000 compensation.

Investigation No. 97/B/4599 (Bristol CC).

March 1999
Ombudsman: Noise Nuisance Not Dealt With Properly

The complainants, a couple who were both over the age of 80 and in increasingly poor health, live in a one-bedroomed Council flat. In 1994, a new tenant moved into the flat above them. That new tenant, from time to time, received treatment for mental health difficulties.

In May 1995, the complainants alleged that the tenant above them was making too much noise. From October 1996 until the Summer of 1998, the complainants made repeated complaints to the Council about the noise from the tenant who had move in above.

The Ombudsman's report concludes that the Council acted with maladministration because, among other things, it did not deal with the complainants' allegations as required by its own procedures on noise nuisance by tenants. In particular, there was poor communication between Council departments and a case conference that was first suggested in December 1996 was not held until March 1998.

The Ombudsman considers it likely that the complainants would not have had to suffer the problems of noise for so long if the Council had acted properly and he recommends that £500 compensation is paid to them.

Investigation No. 97/A/4232 (Hackney LBC).

April 1999
News in Brief

May 1999
London Streets Czar

Louise Casey took up her post as the new Head of the London Rough Sleepers Unit, with a 3-year budget of £145 million to tackle street homelessness in the Capital and for formulating strategies to tackle homelessness outside London. Ms Casey moved from her former post as Deputy Director of Shelter to take up the newly created £70,000 per annum post, with the promise of introducing fundamental changes to the way that London's street homelessness is tackled.

A high priority in her programme was to make contact with homeless people, to establish why they are sleeping rough. She also hoped to recruit troubleshooters from all Government departments, with the aim of developing a team of about 15 professionals - most of whom are to work on grants. Priority is also to be given to preventing homelessness, by making recommendations of tackling root problems - such as poor administration in the Housing Benefits system.

The overall target is to reduce the number of people sleeping rough by two-thirds by the year 2002.

May 1999
News in Brief

June 1999
Homelessness News in Brief

July 1999
Homelessness News in Brief

August 1999
News in Brief

September 1999
Agenda to Tackle Homelessness in Scotland

A new package of measures to fight homelessness in Scotland was unveiled by Scottish Executive Minister for Communities, Wendy Alexander.

The package includes:

The package came hard on the heels of an announcement of an extra £6 million for the Rough Sleepers' Initiative, of which £2 million was likely to go to mainly rural councils to develop comprehensive rough sleeping strategies. A further £2 million is being made available to encourage more support services to help people at risk of sleeping rough, or who need help to maintain their tenancy. The rest will be used to fund proposals which help prevent homelessness, such as local rent deposit schemes.

The Scottish Executive also announced a new strategy for ensuring that fewer young people leaving care fall into rough sleeping. It is estimated that 26% of rough sleepers in Scotland have been in care and 38% have been in prison. Part of the strategy is to tackle the problem of vulnerable young people falling between the DSS benefits system and help provided by local authorities. A current consultation programme centres on how local authorities' role in providing support can be strengthened.

September 1999
RSI Update (England)

September 1999
Homelessness News in Brief

September 1999
Ombudsman: Council Should Pay Applicant £6,000

The complainant alleged that Hackney LBC had taken too long to rehouse him, his wife and their seven children after they were accepted in 1992 as homeless and in priority need.

He also complained about the standard of the temporary accommodation in which he and his family lived between April 1995 and April 1998, which was managed on the Council's behalf by a housing association. When the temporary accommodation was inspected by the Council's Senior Environmental Health Officer in 1998, it was concluded that the premises constituted a statutory nuisance.

Ombudsman Edward Osmotherly's report cites a number of faults by the Council:

The Ombudsman also found that there were faults by the housing association which acted on behalf of the Council. In particular:

The Ombudsman's report recommends that the Council should pay the complainant £6,000 compensation and ensure that complaints are dealt with promptly in accordance with its own complaints procedures.

Investigation Nos. 98/A/1857-8 (Hackney LBC).

October 1999
News in Brief

October 1999
Ombudsman: Inadequate Enquiries and Delay

Complaint Details

The complainant and his wife lived in the North of England with their two children. In June 1996, they separated and the complainant's wife and children moved to Barnet.

In April 1997, the County Court made a joint Residence Order for the children. This required the children to live with the complainant's wife and that they should live with the complainant on such terms as agreed between him and his wife from the date when he was able to provide accommodation in London.

In June 1997, the complainant applied to the Council for housing. The homeless persons' officer had one short interview with him and decided that the Council had no housing duty to him. The complainant appealed against the decision. On 30th September 1997, the Appeals Manager concluded that the decision that the complainant was not homeless was wrong. A homeless persons' officer would have to make further enquiries to decide if the complainant was in priority need.

Another homeless persons' officer interviewed the complainant on 12th November 1997 and advised the Council's solicitor on 17th November 1997 that he considered that the complainant was in priority need because the children were dependent on both parents equally.

The solicitor advised that the Council should provide suitable accommodation for the complainant and the children. On 8th December 1997, the Council formally accepted that it was obliged to provide suitable accommodation.

The Council offered the complainant temporary accommodation for himself but not for the children. He refused it. In July 1998, the Council offered the complainant temporary accommodation for him and the children. He accepted it.

Later in July, the Council offered permanent accommodation, which would have been suitable for the complainant, to another applicant with the same points but whose application was accepted after the complainant.

In February 1999, the Council offered the complainant permanent accommodation.

Between June 1997 and July 1998, the complainant had to commute to London every week to see his children. Sometimes the children spent the weekend with him in the North of England and on other occasions they slept on the floor of the small flat occupied by the complainant's mother.

Findings

Ombudsman Edward Osmotherly's report finds that the Council made inadequate enquiries before deciding that the complainant was not homeless. It concludes that there was excessive delay (until November 1997) in making proper enquiries.

The report also concludes that, if the Council had acted without maladministration, it is likely that, in September 1997, the Council would have accepted a housing duty to the complainant and shortly afterwards would have offered him and the children temporary accommodation. The delay until July 1998 in offering them such accommodation was maladministration, as was the offer of permanent accommodation to an applicant whose application was accepted after the complainant's.

The Ombudsman recommended that the complainant be paid £1,500 compensation.

Investigation Nos. 98/A/0170 & 1437 (Barnet LBC).

November 1999
News Round-up

December 1999
Package Aimed at Helping Rough Sleepers

The Government announced a radical new package aimed at helping the most vulnerable rough sleepers. Key proposals included:

The strategy, which takes effect from April 2000, is targeted at meeting the Government's aims of reducing rough sleeping in England by at least two-thirds by 2002. New statistics estimate that 1,600 sleep rough on any one night.

December 1999
Homelessness News in Brief

December 1999
Ombudsman: Unreasonable Delays in Reviewing Decision

Complaint Details

In July 1996, the complainant applied to Westminster City Council to be rehoused, on the grounds that her privately-rented accommodation was unsuitable for her and her four children. She was told in October 1996 that the Council did not consider this accommodation unsuitable. Following a request, made in November 1996 by a housing agency acting on the complainant's behalf, to review its decision, the Council did carry out a review but took until November 1997 to do so. It decided that the accommodation was unreasonable for occupation by the family.

The Council then decided that it had to establish whether the complainant had made herself intentionally homeless when she left a property owned by Hounslow Council in 1994. It took the Council until September 1998 to obtain the necessary information.

The Council's decision in October 1998 that the complainant was owed a rehousing duty under the Housing Act 1985 resulted in the issue of a notification to that effect - but the notification was issued under the 1996 Act. In January 1999 the correct notification was issued. The complainant had been offered temporary accommodation by the Council, which she accepted in September 1998. She and her family have lived in three different bed and breakfast hotels since that date.

Findings

Ombudsman Edward Osmotherly’s report finds that the Council delayed unreasonably both in reviewing its decision of October 1996 and in obtaining the information from Hounslow. This amounts to maladministration, as does the notification under the Housing Act 1996. The Council admits that there was unreasonable delay and has backdated its rehousing duty to December 1997. The Ombudsman finds that no offers of suitable housing have been made to applicants with less priority than the complainant since that date but recognises that the complainant has been caused avoidable uncertainty and anxiety and recommends that the Council should pay her £250.

The housing agency was put to a great deal of avoidable time and trouble and should be paid £100.

Investigation No. 98/A/0102 (Westminster CC).

January 2000
News in Brief

February 2000
Andy Ludlow Award 2000

The London Housing Unit and the Association of London Government launched the Andy Ludlow Award 2000, which is for innovative projects that assist homeless people in London. The award was established in 1999, to commemorate the achievements of Andy Ludlow and, in particular, his work with homeless people. He died in 1997 and was Director of Housing and Social Services in Haringey LBC.

The award recognises creative and innovative work by homelessness projects in London and it promotes good practices and raises the profile of work with homeless people in the capital. From the many high-calibre entries received last year, the eventual joint winners were the New Hope Project, run by Penrose HA, and the Bayswater Families Centre.

Applications are encouraged from any project, service or initiative in London that shows creativity and innovation, making an important contribution to developing services for homeless people. It is preferred that entries should show either:

Entry each year is open to all housing and social services departments, NHS trust authorities, Registered Social Landlords and voluntary sector organisations. Entrants must be working in the housing or social services field in the London area. Representatives from shortlisted projects will be invited to give short presentations in front of the judges as part of the assessment process. Further information can be obtained from the London Housing Unit - Tel: 0207 428 4917. Further details are also on the London Housing Unit's website at www.lhu.org.uk.

March 2000
News In Brief

March 2000
Ombudsman: Council Fails Homeless Couple

Complaint Details

The complainants allege that Rochford DC failed in its statutory duty towards them when they were faced with eviction in 1997.

When they applied to the Council for rehousing, they were not asked to submit a homelessness application, as the Council was satisfied that they were threatened with homelessness, not intentionally so, and in priority need. The couple found a rented property in the private sector and the Council believed that it had discharged its duty to them but failed to take details of their income to determine whether it was affordable.

In May 1998 the couple moved to a second floor maisonette, which was affordable but which they consider unsuitable, as the wife has a spinal problem which makes it difficult for her to climb stairs. However, nominations to suitable properties in their area of choice have all been made to applicants with a higher priority on the housing register.

Findings

Ombudsman Jerry White's report recommends that the Council should:

Investigation No. 98/B/1653 (Rochford DC).

March 2000
Ombudsman: Written Explanation Needed

Complaint Details

The complainant suffered domestic violence and Enfield LBC accepted a statutory duty to her as a homeless person. It made her two offers of accommodation, withdrawing the first as her former husband lived and worked nearby, but it regarded the second offer as suitable.

The complainant alleges that the Council wrongly told her that, if she refused its offer of temporary accommodation, it would not affect her priority for housing. However, when she refused the second offer, the Council decided it had discharged its homelessness duty to her and she remains without a home of her own.

According to the Housing Officer, the consequences of refusing the second offer were explained to the complainant but the complainant and her mother are certain that no explanation was given. It is, however, clear that no written explanation was given and the Ombudsman considers that this should have been done.

Findings

Ombudsman Edward Osmotherly's report finds that the failure to provide a written explanation caused the complainant injustice, as she would in all likelihood have accepted the second offer - had she been fully aware of the consequences of refusal. The Council now puts this advice in writing.

The Ombudsman recommends that the complainant should be reconsidered for offers of temporary accommodation and that her housing register application should be treated as though the Council had withdrawn the second offer in April 1998.

He further recommends that the Council should pay her £500 compensation.

Investigation No. 98/A/4244 (Enfield LBC).

April 2000
New Study Highlights Scottish Rural Issues

A series of measures to tackle rural homelessness - including setting up emergency accommodation in remote areas and helping young people sustain tenancies - are recommended by a new study, jointly commissioned by national housing Scottish Homes and Shelter Scotland. The study finds that one third of all homeless Scottish households are in rural areas. It also finds anecdotal evidence that homeless people in rural areas are less likely to register with their local authority because of concerns that they would not be housed locally.

Official homelessness statistics suggest that the rate of homelessness is lower in rural areas than in urban settlements - eight out of every 1,000 households are homeless in rural areas compared to 14 out of every 1,000 in urban areas. However, this latest research argues that this difference may be more apparent than real. For example, it shows that rural authorities may be more strict in the way they deal with homeless applications. The difference could also be due to the fact that fewer young, single people - the age group most prone to homelessness - live in rural regions.

Reasons for homelessness are found by the research to be broadly similar for both rural and urban areas, although the amount of people made homeless by Notices to Quit is much higher in rural parts.

Recommendations made by the study include:

April 2000
Focus Needed on Prevention of Homelessness

The call for a more systematic and evidence-based approach to tackling single homelessness and rough sleeping came in research commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and CRASH. It finds that attempts to explain single homelessness as purely a housing problem are giving way to more complex analyses that take account of social, economic and personal risk factors.

The report supports the widely accepted need to focus on prevention of homelessness and suggests possible preventive interventions, including:

The review of single homelessness research was carried out to assess the strength of existing knowledge and identify gaps in the evidence available. CRASH is making the review available to key agencies working with single homeless people free of charge. It has also urged organisations to send in findings from any future research. Studies of importance will be summarised in a web-site bibliography, to be hosted by the University of Glasgow. CRASH will also arrange for the research to be reviewed and published on-line once a year.

Single homelessness: An Overview of Research in Britain is published by The Policy Press, c/o Marston Book Services, PO Box 269, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4YN (01235 465500), price £ 13.95 plus £ 2.50 p&p.


Return To The HMD Archive Index